Posts

Communication Techniques for Better Conversations: The Art of Actually Listening (Without Looking Like a Nodding Dog)

You know what drives me absolutely mental? Sitting in a meeting where everyone's waiting for their turn to speak instead of actually listening to what's being said. I watched this happen just yesterday in a client briefing where three senior managers spent 45 minutes essentially having three separate monologues. Nobody was building on anyone else's ideas, nobody was asking follow-up questions, and by the end, we were further from a solution than when we started.

After 18 years of running communication workshops across Australia, I can tell you that most workplace "conversations" aren't conversations at all – they're just people taking turns broadcasting. And it's costing businesses millions in missed opportunities, workplace conflicts, and employee disengagement.

The Listening Crisis Nobody Talks About

Here's something that'll shock you: the average person retains only 25% of what they hear in a conversation. That means three-quarters of your brilliant insights, carefully crafted feedback, and critical project updates are vanishing into thin air. Yet we keep talking faster and louder instead of slowing down and actually connecting.

I used to be guilty of this myself. Early in my career, I thought good communication meant having the best arguments and the slickest presentations. I'd interrupt people mid-sentence because I was so excited about my next point. Took me about five years and some brutal feedback to realise I was the workplace equivalent of that person who replies to your text before you've finished typing.

The real kicker? Poor communication costs Australian businesses an estimated $62 billion annually in lost productivity. That's not a typo. We're literally talking and listening our way into economic disaster.

Why Your Open Office Is Killing Conversation

Let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say the 47 elephants crammed into your open-plan workspace. These architectural disasters have convinced us that proximity equals communication. Wrong. Dead wrong.

I've worked with companies where people sit three metres apart but communicate exclusively through Slack because they're terrified of "disrupting" their neighbours. Meanwhile, the naturally loud talkers dominate every conversation while the introverts retreat further into their shells. It's like designing a restaurant where everyone has to whisper.

The best conversations happen in environments where people feel psychologically safe to speak up, make mistakes, and explore half-formed ideas. That's rarely achieved when Kevin from accounting can hear every word of your performance review.

The Four Types of Workplace Listeners (And Why Three of Them Are Useless)

After observing thousands of workplace interactions, I've identified four distinct listening styles:

The Waiter: They're not listening; they're waiting for their turn to speak. You can actually see them rehearsing their response while you're talking. Their favourite phrase is "That reminds me of when I..."

The Interrupter: These people collect half-sentences like Pokemon cards. They've heard enough to form an opinion and can't wait to share it. Usually wrong, always confident.

The Nodder: They nod at everything like those dashboard dogs. Looks engaged, but ask them to summarise what you just said and watch the panic in their eyes.

The Actually-Listening Human: Rare species. Asks clarifying questions, builds on your ideas, remembers details from conversations weeks later. Often confused for management material.

Guess which type gets promoted most often? Here's a hint: it's not the one you'd expect.

The Questions That Change Everything

Here's where most communication training gets it wrong. They teach you to maintain eye contact, nod appropriately, and reflect back what you've heard. That's not conversation – that's performing conversation.

Real communication happens when you ask questions that genuinely intrigue you. Not "How was your weekend?" but "What's the most interesting problem you're working on right now?" Not "Any questions?" but "What would need to change for this to be even better?"

I learned this from a client in Brisbane who transformed their team meetings simply by banning the phrase "Does that make sense?" Instead, they started asking "What questions does this raise for you?" Suddenly, meetings that used to end with confused nodding became collaborative problem-solving sessions.

The magic words that unlock workplace communication aren't "please" and "thank you" – though those help. They're "Tell me more about..." and "What if we tried..." and "I hadn't considered that."

Why Feedback Feels Like Root Canal Surgery

Let's be honest about feedback conversations. We approach them like diplomatic negotiations between hostile nations. Everyone's walking on eggshells, speaking in code, and hoping the other person will magically understand what we really mean.

I once watched a manager spend 20 minutes telling an employee they were "doing great work with opportunities for growth" when what they meant was "your reports are consistently late and poorly formatted." The employee left thinking they were up for a promotion. Guess how that performance review went?

Direct doesn't mean brutal. Kind doesn't mean vague. The best feedback conversations I've witnessed started with "I want to help you succeed, so I need to share something specific that could make a difference."

The Power of the Uncomfortable Pause

This might be controversial, but I think we need more awkward silences in the workplace. Not the hostile kind where everyone's angry, but the thoughtful kind where people are actually processing what's been said.

Most managers fill every pause with more talking because silence feels like failure. But some of the best insights emerge from those moments when someone finally says, "You know what, I need to think about that differently."

I've started incorporating emotional intelligence training principles into my workshops, and one of the most powerful exercises is simply counting to seven after asking a question. Seven seconds feels like an eternity when you're used to rapid-fire exchanges, but it's amazing what people will share when they feel like you're genuinely waiting for their answer.

The Meeting Trap That's Destroying Communication

Here's something nobody wants to admit: most meetings would be better as emails, and most emails would be better as conversations. We've got it completely backwards.

We schedule hour-long meetings to discuss things that could be resolved in a five-minute conversation. Then we send novel-length emails about complex issues that need back-and-forth dialogue. It's like using a screwdriver as a hammer and wondering why nothing's working properly.

The best managers I know have mastered the art of the two-minute conversation. They catch problems early, clarify expectations quickly, and save the formal meetings for actual decision-making. Revolutionary concept, I know.

Technology: The Great Communication Enabler or Destroyer?

Video calls have taught us something interesting about human communication: we're terrible at reading the room when we can only see people from the shoulders up. Half the nuance of conversation comes from body language, energy levels, and those subtle shifts in attention that signal when someone's mentally checked out.

But here's the thing – we've also learned that some people communicate better in writing, others need visual aids, and quite a few prefer the structured format of a well-run virtual meeting over the chaos of an open office. The trick is matching the medium to the message and the people involved.

Slack can be brilliant for quick clarifications and terrible for complex negotiations. Video calls work well for relationship-building and poorly for brainstorming. Email is perfect for documentation and disastrous for anything requiring emotional intelligence.

The Cultural Conversation Crisis

Australian workplaces are more diverse than ever, which should be making our conversations richer and more innovative. Instead, we're often talking past each other because we haven't learned to navigate different communication styles.

Some cultures value directness; others see it as rude. Some prize quick decision-making; others need time to process. Some love a good debate; others find conflict deeply uncomfortable. There's no right or wrong approach, but pretending these differences don't exist is communication suicide.

I've worked with teams where breakthrough innovations happened when they finally learned to leverage these different approaches instead of fighting them. The detail-oriented analyst paired with the big-picture visionary. The relationship-builder working alongside the task-focused problem-solver.

The Conversation Skills They Don't Teach in Business School

Here's what they should be teaching but aren't: how to disagree without being disagreeable, how to change your mind gracefully, and how to say "I don't know" without losing credibility.

The best workplace conversations I've witnessed included at least one person admitting they were wrong about something or didn't understand a key point. It signals intellectual honesty and opens the door for real learning.

Conversely, the worst conversations feature people defending positions they don't really believe because they're afraid changing their mind makes them look weak. News flash: the ability to update your thinking based on new information is literally the definition of intelligence.

Making It Stick: The Daily Communication Habits That Actually Work

All this theory means nothing without practical application. The communication improvements that last come from tiny daily habits, not dramatic overhauls.

Start with one question per day that you genuinely want to know the answer to. Not "How's everything going?" but "What's working well in your current project that we could apply elsewhere?"

Listen to one complete thought before formulating your response. Just one. See what happens.

End conversations with "What haven't I asked that I should have?" More often than not, the most important information comes out in response to this question.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Workplace Communication

After nearly two decades in this field, I've reached a conclusion that might annoy some people: most communication problems aren't really communication problems. They're clarity problems, trust problems, or power problems disguised as communication issues.

You can teach someone every active listening technique in the book, but if they don't trust their manager or feel safe speaking up, the techniques become performance art. You can run workshop after workshop on difficult conversations, but if the workplace culture punishes honesty, people will keep telling you what they think you want to hear.

Real communication improvement requires addressing these underlying issues, not just polishing the surface-level skills.

The good news? When organisations get serious about creating psychologically safe environments where honest conversation is valued over political maneuvering, the transformation is remarkable. Teams start solving problems faster, innovation increases, and people actually enjoy coming to work.

That's the conversation worth having.

Looking to improve communication in your workplace? These techniques work best when implemented systematically across teams, not just individuals. Consider professional training options that address both skills and culture.